Sunday, January 1, 2017

AGUIRRE TO REPORTERS: WHAT TRUST DID THE PRESIDENT BETRAY?





Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II on Sunday laughed off claims that President Rodrigo Duterte may be impeached for assuring policemen who killed detained Albuera Mayor Rolando Espinosa that they wouldn’t land behind bars.

Aguirre, who served as private prosecutor in the impeachment trial of the late Chief Justice Renato Corona in the Senate, said Mr. Duterte did not violate the Constitution when he defended Supt. Marvin Marcos and his men.

Marcos is the sacked chief of the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) in Eastern Visayas who mapped out the predawn raid on Espinosa’s detention cell on Nov. 5, which led to the mayor’s death.


Contrary to the claim of Marcos and his men, Espinosa could not have engaged in a shootout with policemen from his cell at the Leyte subprovincial jail in Baybay City, as the mayor had no gun, according to the National Bureau of Investigation.

The police claimed they were searching for a gun in Espinosa’s cell based on a warrant.

“What is impeachable about it? What trust did the President betray?” Aguirre asked reporters in an interview. “Some are just making a big issue out of it.”

Last week, the President said he believed in the version of Marcos and his men regarding Espinosa’s death even after the NBI concluded that his killing was a “rubout.”

He issued the statement despite admitting that Marcos was “tainted” and that he himself had ordered the lifting of the administrative relief of the CIDG official because he had him under surveillance for his supposed links to the illegal drug trade.

Said Mr. Duterte: “I will not allow these guys to go to prison. I don’t care if the NBI says it’s murder. Anyway, the NBI and the Department of Justice are both under [my authority].”

The NBI is the justice department’s investigative arm.

Sen. Leila de Lima, the President’s arch-critic, said Mr. Duterte’s remark was akin to providing pardon to Espinosa’s killers even before they could be formally charged.

“He has exonerated them already. That’s not even his duty because the duty belongs to the judiciary, to the court. So that’s bordering on impeachability,” De Lima said.






Share this story and like us on Facebook! 

DISCLAIMER: Contributed articles does not reflect the view of JuanSipag.com. This website cannot guarantee the legitimacy of some of the information contributed to us. You may do additional research if you find some information doubtful.


COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by JuanSipag.com. Comments are views by JuanSipag.com readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of JuanSipag.com. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with JuanSipag.com editorial standards, JuanSipag.com may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.

No comments:

Post a Comment